Capo district to clarify gifts ban in wake of coach firings

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO – Capistrano Unified trustees on Wednesday night will discuss revisions to a district policy governing how employees make school purchases and accrue credits and incentives, just two days after they fired three high school coaches believed to have secretly received kickbacks from a sporting equipment company.

Capistrano Unified school board policy would be revised to clarify that employees cannot receive “gifts, incentives, inducements, favors, monetary returns either promised or given, and/or rebates of any kind” that don’t “accrue directly” to the district.

Former Dana Hills High head football coach Brent Melbon hugs one of his players after a 2009 football game. Melbon, who worked as a full-time P.E. teacher at the Dana Point school, was fired Monday by Capistrano Unified trustees for his involvement in a money kickback scheme involving a sporting equipment company.TEXT BY SCOTT MARTINDALE, FILE PHOTO: KEVIN SULLIVAN, THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTERMORE PHOTOS »

On Monday, the district’s seven trustees voted unanimously to terminate and seek “financial restitution” from former head football coaches Eric Patton of San Clemente High, Chi Chi Biehn of Mission Viejo’s Capistrano Valley High and Brent Melbon of Dana Point’s Dana Hills High.

District spokesman Marcus Walton said the proposed policy revision was part of a routine updating of a number of district rules, and not connected to any specific event or action.

“There’s no reason for the timing of this board policy coming forward now,” Walton said. “It’s just something that most organizations continually look at and evaluate as they continue their operations.”

Walton stressed that the proposed revision was intended to clarify existing board policies already barring employees from accepting gifts and money. Indeed, existing board Policy 3291 prohibits employees from accepting gifts “in which it could be construed that the gift was given as a condition for providing educational services to a student, or to influence the district’s decision to purchase instructional materials or any other items of value.”

The proposed revision to Capistrano Unified board Policy 3315 states in part, “Any supplier attempting to or providing such incentives shall result in the immediate termination of any existing and future order(s) to the supplier. The district will take any and all appropriate actions deemed necessary including, but not limited to, referral to local law enforcement authorities.”

On Wednesday night, district trustees will conduct an initial review of the proposed policy revision; it likely will then be voted on at a meeting next month.

Protracted investigation

Capistrano’s decision to remove three veteran coaches from the field and from their full-time teaching positions was the culmination of a 16-month district investigation into high school coaches who did business with Lapes Athletic Team Sales, a now-defunct Laguna Hills sporting equipment company.

At least three other Capistrano Unified assistant football coaches may have been disciplined for their involvement in the scheme.

The district’s investigation centered on personal spending accounts that Capistrano coaches allegedly maintained with Lapes Athletic over the past two decades, allowing them to convert school district funds into personal credits that they could then spend as they saw fit, without district oversight.

Most of the public taxpayer money appeared to have been funneled back into athletic programs, although independent media investigations, including the Register’s, found some of the money may have been spent on personal clothing gear for coaches and other improper uses.

Although Capistrano Unified officials have insisted they cannot comment on the cases, they have stressed that the district would be compelled to investigate any employee who used even one dollar of public taxpayer money for an “unapproved purchase.”

The Orange County Sheriff’s Department launched a probe last year, but has not released any findings.

Origins of probe

The misconduct by the coaches was brought to Capistrano Unified’s attention about 1-1/2 years ago by Irvine investors Geoff and Teresa Sando, who acquired the Lapes Athletic company and its billing records in 2008, in the wake of an investment deal that turned sour.

As they sifted through the bankrupt company’s financial records, the Sandos discovered that founder and long-time owner Bill Lapes had maintained personal spending accounts for the coaches that allowed them to convert taxpayer money into spending credits.

The Sandos accused coaches at about 30 O.C. high schools and community colleges of being part of the scheme, and turned over detailed accounting ledgers and other financial records to the school districts.

Mission Viejo’s Saddleback College subsequently disciplined one athletic department employee, and Patton’s attorney, Eric Hansen, said at least three other San Clemente High assistant football coaches were disciplined as well.

Irvine Unified and Newport-Mesa Unified said they did not discipline any employees, while Saddleback Valley Unified said its investigation was ongoing.

Although the Sandos have acknowledged their relationship with Lapes dates back to when Geoff Sando began working as the company’s part-time accountant – and the Sandos subsequently invested money into the business – the Sandos maintain that Bill Lapes kept two sets of books, and that they were unaware of the coaches’ personal spending accounts until after the company went bankrupt.

Bill Lapes has never granted an interview on the matter; his sons, Chad and Adam, who once worked for their father, have suggested the Sandos knew of the scheme all along and only publicized it because they lost money in the Lapes investment deal.

The Sandos said many districts across Southern California were watching the Capistrano case closely, and more are likely to move forward in the wake of the discipline imposed there.

0 Comments

Controversial charters in RTP and Chapel Hill headed for approval

Two controversial charter schools to be located in the Triangle appear headed toward state approval today despite fierce local opposition centered on questions of money and diversity.

Research Triangle High School would open in Durham, and the Howard and Lillian Lee Scholars Charter School would open in Chapel Hill in August if the full State Board of Education follows the recommendation of one of its committees to approve them along with seven other charters. Those nine would be the first approved under a new law that eliminated the 100-school cap that contained charter expansion for 15 years.

The proposed Durham and Chapel Hill schools inflamed a debate about racial and economic diversity, competition, and public money going to support charters. Charters are public schools but operate without many of the rules that traditional public schools must follow.

State Board Chairman Bill Harrison said more than 900 people contacted him about the Research Triangle High School and the Lee Scholars academy. Most of the Chapel Hill messages were against the school, he said, while comments on the Durham school were more balanced between opponents and supporters.

These local protests are likely to be repeated in other communities as the state begins a new era of charter school expansion with no legal limit on their numbers. Although just nine schools are up for final approval today, more are expected to apply to open next year.

The Republican-controlled legislature is closely watching for anti-charter bias on the Democratic-dominated state education board. Early on, Republicans proposed limiting the board’s control over charters. Harrison, legislative Democrats and Gov. Bev Perdue had to fight to keep it.

Durham opponents mounted a vigorous campaign against Research Triangle High School. Almost every elected official in Durham, including local legislators, asked the state board to reject it. The school board discussed the school more than the others, and it recalled details of a letter Durham Superintendent Eric Becoats wrote about the toll charters are taking on the district and the proposed school’s establishment of a science-and-technology focused program that would replicate the district’s efforts.

Choice of science schools

Durham has eight existing charters that enroll nearly 9 percent of the county’s students, he wrote. The Durham district has five schools with an emphasis on science, technology, engineering and math, he added.

“I thought a charter was to meet needs that were not being met,” said state board member Chris Greene, referencing Becoats’ letter.

Harrison said the opposition from the local legislators particularly weighed on his mind, but state law does not say that a charter with a science and math focus should be prohibited if traditional schools already have them.

“Based on what the statute tells us and how we interpret the law and how our legal folks interpret that, that’s the direction I felt I needed to go,” Harrison said during a break in the meeting.

If there’s not a need for the charter, parents won’t apply, he said.

Committee members did not comment on the Lee Scholars academy. The NAACP and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools said the charter will take about $4.5 million from the district and decrease diversity. The charter is aimed at closing the achievement gap, specifically for African-American students. All students would be eligible to attend. The NAACP opposed having the for-profit National Heritage Academies managing the school.

Diversity concerns

Durham leaders are suspicious that the charter high school, near Research Triangle Park, will target RTP employees and draw mainly white, affluent parents. Charters must have a transportation plan for students, but they do not have to operate school buses. Charters are not required to provide lunch.

Durham School Board member Natalie Beyer said charters in Durham enroll a smaller percentage of students who qualify for free lunch than do district schools.

Lack of meals, requirements for parents to volunteer and lack of transportation “prevent students of high need from attending charter schools,” she said. “They are not serving students equitably.”

In a letter to Harrison, Pamela Blizzard, Research Triangle High School executive director, responded to some of the criticism, saying that the school is working actively for student diversity.

The school is advertising on hip-hop and gospel stations, she wrote, and is holding meetings in libraries, Boys & Girls Clubs, Latino centers and black and white churches.

She reported that halfway through the recruitment period, 39 percent of applicants are African-American or multiracial. Forty-nine percent of applicants are from Wake County and 41 percent are from Durham. Only three students who are eligible for free or reduced lunch said they would apply.

The school will use teaching techniques different from those in traditional public schools, Blizzard said, and plans to share ideas with the traditional schools. Using charters as laboratories for innovation was one of the early goals, but there’s often more tension than sharing between charters and traditional public schools.

Blizzard said she was surprised that the Research Triangle proposal became a flashpoint for discontent over charters.

“We’re doing the thing charters are supposed to do,” she said.

0 Comments

Too many students gaining A grades, top examiner admits

Employers and universities are increasingly unable to “discriminate the very best from the average and the poor” because too many teenagers leave school with A grades, it was claimed.

Jerry Jarvis, managing director of Edexcel for four years, said top marks had grown year-on-year because of bite-sized modules, exam re-sits, teaching to the test in schools and political pressure to improve results.

He compared the current grading system to the Olympic high jump competition, saying the UK educational establishment had “attempted to keep the GCSE and A-level standard – the ‘height of the bar’ – at the same level for years”.

Mr Jarvis also told how he quit as a direct result of attempts to “manipulate” exams grades under the former Labour government in 2009.

Writing in a new book, he said: “The current system does not effectively discriminate; it does not rank-order the attainment of students.

“Too many candidates attain top grades, undermining the achievement of the very best.”

He added “When we see an exam set with grades A to G, we intuitively expect that a few students will achieve grade A; it simply does not feel right when large numbers attain the top grade.”

Almost a quarter of GCSE papers were graded A* or A last year – around three times as many as when the exams were first introduced in 1988.

At A-level, some 27 per cent of entries scored the top marks in 2011 and the overall pass-rate increased for the 29th year in a row.

Mr Jarvis warned that grade boundaries were “fixed some years ago and cannot effectively provide a reference for standards over time because teaching and learning have improved (and arguably so has teaching to the test)”.

He called for wide-ranging reform of the system, including a national ranking system in which each pupil sitting the same exam is set against all other students to identify high, middle and low performers. This could sit alongside broad-brush grades to “indicate the relative performance of each student compared to his or her peers”, he said.

Writing in the book “Cheats, Choices & Dumbing Down”, he said: “Perhaps the single biggest failure of the exam system is that it has presided over a loss of public confidence.

“Confidence will only be restored if exam outcomes are intuitively sensible and transparent.”

Mr Jarvis said that – under his leadership – Edexcel analysed the performance of individual classes and teachers and made the data available to schools.

But he said the vast majority of schools “decline to make use” of it – allowing “poor teachers and poor schools [to] carry on as before”.

“Educationalists seem to me to be a long way from openly inviting constructive criticism,” he said. “Very few teachers are dismissed for incompetence, and I was able to see the same depressing class outcomes again and again in the analyses.”

In further comments, he told how he resigned in 2009 as a direct result of the introduction of bite-sized modules in GCSEs. It required examiners to award marks for each module but then “apply adjustments to avoid inflation in the overall grade”.

But he said: “I could not accept this further manipulation of an already complex assessment process.

“I would no longer be able to claim publicly that the grades awarded reflected the ability of the students that I was responsible for assessing.”

An Edexcel spokesman said: “Jerry Jarvis left Edexcel in 2009 having helped to build our position as one of the most reliable and innovative awarding bodies in the world.

“It’s important that we have a debate about how this country can establish world beating standards, so we are seeking teachers’, parents’ and experts’ views on how to improve the system, through our Leading on Standards consultation. We welcome all contributions to this debate.”

0 Comments

Keep the Creation Museum off the Kiddie List

Kentucky’s Creation Museum is in contention for listing as one of the “top ten” places to bring your child under 15 years of age on this travel and tourism site.

Feel free to go and vote your preference! Also, I

I think you can’t vote something down, but you can vote something up. You know what to do.

The flying spaghetti monster museum does appear to be a choice. If it does not really exist, however, I don’t recommend voting for it, as that would be stupid. Maybe pick a nice natural history museum.

0 Comments